Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Waxing Political - by Randy Inman

 
Right Wing writer dropping pearls of wisdom all over the internet.

Democrats trying to steal an Election

November 13th 2008 00:07
Police Van
We need to lock these crooks up.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Democrats are trying to steal an election. I know that is really shocking since they are for the “Little Guy” and fair play. But it clear they will do anything to gain more power. This is going to be a long four years folks. Check the article about their latest attempts to do wrong.



67
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      Can Obama be defeated? 
      War pending with Iran? 
Comments
25 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by NoaIzumi

November 13th 2008 01:39
It's an editorial. It raises some good questions (and I have to admit my suspicions are raised too), but it's not quite the same thing as an article, nor is it "reporting".

Comment by Lester Caudill

November 13th 2008 03:22
Hey Randy I wouldn't expect less from the Democratic Secretary of State Mark Ritchie who has ties to ACORN, and is very liberal.

Comment by Anonymous

November 13th 2008 04:54
Coleman needs to follow the law..the law says less than 1% triggers a recount. Coleman has 120 lawyers going around the entire state and your buddy mitt romeny is going to help bankroll this. So, get off this bandwagon and find something else to cry about. Let the process run itself out. I am sure that the lawyers are going to be all over this. So, just relax!!!


Comment by Jim Stillman

November 13th 2008 12:14
Randy, I am disappointed.

You state that Democrats are trying to steal the Minnesota Senatorial race by stealing it. That seems a bit premature
.
First, Minnesota has an excellent history of fair elections and election officials – Republican and Democrat, Second, Barack Obama won the state by 10 % and I would expect the Democratic Senate candidate to do well there. Third, you infer that the campaign of Al Franken is causing/requesting the recount for implementation of a plan to “steal” the election.

Please consider that the Canvassing board is comprised with a majority of Republicans and there has been not the slightest indication that it might be unfair. Finally, the recount is mandatory under Minnesota law. The statute is long but you can look it up – Minn. Statutes, 2006, as amended, § 204C.35 (1).

Assuming that the Republican dominated Canvassing board which has a good reputation with both state parties seems premature.

Comment by S.L.

November 14th 2008 19:31
Another good one, Randy. the Democrats are determined to have their majority by whatever means they can find. They continue (yes, Jim, this means you, too) about how President Bush "stole" his elections, when there was no actual evidence or credible accusation (except for the Dems). But watching these electoral thefts doesn't seem interesting to them. Having fooled a majority of non-thinking voters to elect the least qualified and most liberal president in our history wasn't good enough for them. Now they want to be sure they have a fillibuster-proof situation so their "hero" can get away with whatever he wants. Forget the "checks and balances!"

Comment by Randy Inman

November 14th 2008 22:40
Stillman I sent off for that Library card but it hasn't got here yet.

Comment by NoaIzumi

November 15th 2008 18:47
You know, SL, for a guy with an American flag as his posting image, you don't think much of Americans or have much faith in America.

Comment by S.L.

November 15th 2008 19:07
On the contrary, NoaIzumi, I do have confidence in America. It's the idiotic voters that concern me. They have just proven that they don't have the brains that God gave a rock by electing a mental case. America is a wonderful place (except for the liberal faction that is determined to destroy us, that is!)

Comment by Randy Inman

November 15th 2008 23:33
I am pretty sure S.L. isn't a guy lol.

Comment by S.L.

November 15th 2008 23:36
Thanks Randy! I was a little surprised, too, but it seemed like too much trouble to set the record straight. LOL

Comment by Randy Inman

November 15th 2008 23:46
Must have been SOME vacation if you came back as a guy!

Comment by S.L.

November 15th 2008 23:50
LOL Randy!! Nope, I left as a little old lady and returned as one. Did put on a few pounds, of course! Salt water taffy is both cheap and abundant on the coast. As are fine wines!! lol

Comment by Anonymous

November 16th 2008 00:32
S.L. is an American and is entitled to her opinion. This is what America is all about. The problem is that not only does she not faith, all this wild and crazy conspiracy theories are thrown out that truly have no basis in fact. Minnesota law says an automatic recount if it is less than 1%. There are enough lawyers to cover all the precints.

What's the bottom line, folks: have faith!!!

Comment by S.L.

November 16th 2008 00:41
I'm not sure what you mean by saying I do not faith, Anonymous. I have a lot of faith, and I read my Bible. Have you done any reading? Especially in the last book? Maybe you should....

Comment by NoaIzumi

November 16th 2008 01:32
Sorry about the mix-up, SL. This is a shot in the dark, but you wouldn't happen to post on Townhall.com under the name Mountain Rose, would you? Back when I was a regular there, I crossed pens with her several times.

Comment by S.L.

November 16th 2008 02:07
Sorry noaIzumi. I've never been anyone but myself. S.L. Bradish. For some reason, Orble removed my last name.

Comment by Anonymous

November 16th 2008 03:10
S.L.

Thanks for your comments. You and the rest of the folks who are so paranoid need to have faith in the system to work. Jim Stillman told us about the actual minnesota law that mandates this process. That's all. Let's avoid all these conspiracy theories and make sure that we all focus on what we're all rightfully concerned about: how to get out of the world-wide economic mess we are in.

Comment by S.L.

November 16th 2008 03:13
We might start by preventing the people who caused it from being the ones to "fix" it, don't ya think? Have you considered that we aren't paranoid, but that Jim is living in a fantasy world where Democrats are the good guys?

Comment by Randy Inman

November 16th 2008 11:11
The only good Democrat is a Reagan Democrat.

Comment by Jim Stillman

November 16th 2008 15:42
Randy, I was really expecting more light than heat from you.

“Only good Democrat is a Reagan Democrat”?


It's the idiotic voters that concern me. They have just proven that they don't have the brains that God gave a rock by electing a mental case. America is a wonderful place (except for the liberal faction that is determined to destroy us, that is!)

Do you really and truly ascribe to the statements that the 63 million people who voted for Obama were “idiotic” or that “they don't have the brains that God gave a rock” or that President-elect is a “mental case” and, finally, that liberals are “determined to destroy us”? And who is us



If you do not feel that all those with contrary opinions are brainless mental cases determined to destroy the country and you say nothing on your own Blog, then you. My friend, are more than disappointed; I am offended and ashamed.


Comment by S.L.

November 16th 2008 16:00
And well you should be, Jim. Ashamed, that is. Randy knows the difference between right and wrong and could teach you about it, if you were willing to learn. But like most "good liberals" you are stuck in the socialist mode. The "us" he meant (and I mean when I use the term) is US, as in USA. B.O. has grand plans to turn us into a socialist regime where "spreading the wealth" is the mantra and abortion is the sacrament. Maybe you have been so mezmerized by B.O.'s "eloquence" that you didn't her what he has in store. Some of US are capable of rational thought processes and unwilling to fall for pretty words without taking note of the substance therein.

Comment by Anonymous

November 16th 2008 17:26
Folks,

I would really, really like to know what "proof" you all have that they are trying to steal it? No conjecture, no assumptions, no crap that is posted on human events or worldnet daily...just proof. Just because you think they might steal the election, does not necessarily mean they are going to. As I wrote before, Coleman has enough lawyers on the beat. So, let's again stay calm and allow the process to work.

Now, as far a good democrat being a Reagan Democrat, Randy is again entitled to his opinion. But, adopting a 21st centruy Mccarythism mentality will do nothing to help overcome the economic malaise that we are faced with. As I have read this discussion, that's the disappointment that I have. We have a wonderful opportunity to have a genuine debate to figure out what can be done. 63 Million people voted for an opportunity to try something different. What is certain is that less regulation, constant tax cuts did not work. The bailout, too, was a disaster in the way it was handled. So, we have to see what can be done before we're all out of a job and homeless. That's the reality. We can blast each other all we want. But, we'll be back at where we started.

Comment by Anonymous

November 16th 2008 17:28
S.L.,

"B.O" as you like to call him now (which is cool) has to begin performing. He has the job now. The time for talking is indeed over. Now is the time for action. On that we do agree.

Comment by S.L.

November 17th 2008 00:59
Proof, huh, Anonymous? Dialogue, perhaps? Did you somehow manage to miss the testimony of people (before Congress) who recounted the many ways that ACORN bought or bribed them into registering to vote Democrat? The fancy tap dancing going on about whether or not ballots were mysteriously "found" in a car trunk? The "presumptive votes?" (Those are the ones where a person voted for everything on the ballot except the president. Most of them were Democrats and the counters assume that the voters were just too stupid to mark the spot for B.O. and count those votes for him. It never occurs to them that they might not have wanted to vote for him and knew what they were doing...) In Pliladelphia (among other places) there were people stationed in front of the polling place, to make sure no one but B.O. voters got in. Then we have the ever popular trash about how having to show ID in order to vote will terrorize or intimidate voters.

I'm sure I left something out, but surely you get the idea...

Comment by Randy Inman

November 17th 2008 09:11
Ok anon tell me how rasing capital gains taxes, pulling 401 K's out of the market and letting the Bush Tax cuts lax will help anything.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
146 Posts dating from July 2005
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Randy Inman's Blogs

42595 Vote(s)
749 Comment(s)
695 Post(s)
Moderated by Randy Inman
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]