Randy Inman
Kim K.
Are we headed for a one world government?
June 8th 2009 21:48
Are we headed for a one world government or do we have one already? Sound like some dark conspiracy to you? Yeah it has to me as well for years but I love a good conspiracy theory and monitor some of the sites that promote them.
I am still not sure if we are indeed heading for a one world government but let me lay this out for discussion. Despite all the to do about Obama taking over for George Bush, he is pretty much doing the same things Bush was doing. Keeping Gitmo open and the Homeland Security laws which are just legal means to keep American Citizens under surveillance. Obama didn’t change the so called torture laws because there were no laws broken anyway and he wants to be able to waterboard people if needed.
Obama even has mentioned a world order in speeches as have the Bush’s. Go check out Infowars.com for all the information on one world government that you could ever process.
Frankly if I have a good job and can support my family I don’t have a problem with a one world government. But I sense it would be the worst police state in the history of the world and would incite rebellion in dozens of countries. I would love to hear other people’s opinions on this.
I am still not sure if we are indeed heading for a one world government but let me lay this out for discussion. Despite all the to do about Obama taking over for George Bush, he is pretty much doing the same things Bush was doing. Keeping Gitmo open and the Homeland Security laws which are just legal means to keep American Citizens under surveillance. Obama didn’t change the so called torture laws because there were no laws broken anyway and he wants to be able to waterboard people if needed.
Obama even has mentioned a world order in speeches as have the Bush’s. Go check out Infowars.com for all the information on one world government that you could ever process.
Frankly if I have a good job and can support my family I don’t have a problem with a one world government. But I sense it would be the worst police state in the history of the world and would incite rebellion in dozens of countries. I would love to hear other people’s opinions on this.
Is a one world government the right way to go?
| 167 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Look at the European countries that have growing Muslim populations and can't put an end to the violence, even within their own borders. The best way I can see to unite the countries and have them work together is to allow each to run their own business without some central government telling them how to do things. The UN has tried and failed miserably at every turn.
That being said, we need some form of international law to prevent genocide and protect civilian populations from the sort of strife that Sri Lanka has gone through. Since the UN is such a waste of effort, we should disband it and form a council that can act when necessary and back off when not needed.
Comment by signals
The Health Fanatic
The Natural Order
Media Piranha
Arrogant News
The Dope Chronicles
Financial Ramble
Aviation Domination
Our Daily Sites
Pet Husbandry
The Proud Omnivore
In answer to your question, I personally don't believe a one world government is the way to go. But I am going to say that that is where we are heading whether we want to or not.
Comment by Lilla
From The Home Front
Enviro Warrior
Dream Herald
Esoteric Bookshop
Not an easy question for me to answer but I cannot see how it can be avoided in a world of shrinking resources? There are a few perspectives to consider, including conspiracy theories and alien agendas I s*pose, if one is to keep an open mind.
However, I always try to look at the basics and they are simple enough; He who controls the food, controls the world. (and a clue here is perhaps that it is not the governments of the world today) . .
But back at base camp : mismanaged resources, dwindling as a result of those same bungling governments also in debt, greater demand than supply, escalating populations clamouring for more food than farmers can grow and we quickly come to the realms few want to look at honestly; Geneic modification, hydroponics and *one world* conglomerates who own the world through its food production.
Perhaps there will come a time when both sides themselves will question whether or not they need governments as we know them today, at all?
There are no options within the fractional reserve banking system as we know it as it is a makeshift, fictitional system which must come to its own by virtue of its very structure. So it makes sense that a new system will have to incorporate it. Cue Star Trek like Federation of countries without the need for money as we know it? . . Makes sense if all citizens are to be clothed and fed? Very Chinese.
But how do you police this changeover. Ivan Stein*s world tour included talks about over 60 detention centres already built around the US in preparation for the 2012 geophysical mess and the lock downs it is predicted to incurr, and that microchipping is already on the cards, microchips which can be *switched off?*?
You can see I have thought about this in depth and gone around many circles here over the ensuing years . . ((laughs)) because I have tried to look at it at the grass roots level. That is what if the money system as we know *changes over*? The banks (as we know them) will close, they can*t recall the mortgages can they? ALL the people would be on the streets kiling each other for a loaf of bread and the houses empty, that is silly. So along they come and you are microchipped instead if you want to keep your home? You are assigned a job and rations to go with that and either reassigned a home with that job, or keep your own? Like star trek we somehow emerge in another way from there, under a federation of countries. . one country produces beef, one potatoes, another cabbages and so on.
God only knows how though, because China is the one who will never ascent to it, it seems, yet : they too rely so heavily now on the fractional banking system themselves now too, but we are talking a deep form of comunism, yet it is also democratic. What of Korea? What of our seperate religions and beliefs under this system?
A hybrid democracy where all the conglomerates of the world form the one ruling *government* although it will not be government as we know it, as its ass is also owned by the ruling elite, is it not? Perhaps a way for Overlords to return?
Charming thought!
Annoying because it is clearly this money system which makes slaves of us and in our need for it we have been nicely herded into cities, totally dependant on our governments and the fractional banking reserve itself for our food ~ just like Egyptian slaves. Way to go human race.
Theory #1 : the ruling elite can leave for the space station, leaving us to fight it out amongst ourselves, if geophysical mess or pandemic occurs. Then back they come and it all starts again, as new one world order?
hahaha that is one of my personal favourite nutter theories!
Theory #2 : We were given technology by aliens to enslave us and that the overlords will return to collect the human slaves at a later date, soon to be here as we all gather in nice compact cities?
Theory #3 : all is as it is and a result of our own fall and greed and what have you and it will have to play itself out like Mad Max until the Golden Age is reached ~ DS9 and the Dominion war years revisted?
Theory #4 : there will be three sub governments under the one great power. 1. The Euro Dollar 2. The Amero and 3. The Austro (when Australia will link with Asia?). .
Theory #5 : a Pandemic will soon be released to relieve the burden on the worlds food supply and right all the wrongs, so whats the problem?
Theory #6 : Another of my favourites : Things will go on as it always has and nothing will change, it is all a conspiracy theory. The world population is not growing and resources are not dwindling and there is no global warming. The Fractional Money Reserve system can keep manufacturing money out of thin air ~ when there is absolutely nothing to back it up ~ resource wise or any other way. There could NEVER be a one world super power or even a conglomeration of ruling elite. How silly is that a notion?
ha ha ha!
Theory #7 : Ascension of the human race to the less corporeal 5th Dimension?
I can*t decide, but like you, I hope there is a meal in it for me somewhere too, somewhere with a ncie temporate climate?
Lilla . .
Comment by Damo
Now we can all get some sleep.
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
I believe they would not try and dismantle the public identities of sovereign governments, but, control through a new form of 'cooperation' with international investment and banking schemes, done under the guise of making it all safer and more stable, than the current financial status...which it will be, but, at a huge cost to local civil liberties and workers conditions.
We live in interesting times...
cheers
fog
Comment by Wilson Pon
Health 2 Know
Adventure Toes
Techno Stuffs
boxing sound
Business Rope
Fun Places 2 Travel
However, it might be possible in one circumstance, where all the human beings from around the globe have been brainwashing and only obey to one person's order (Oh mine, it started to sound like the Dalek...)
Comment by Lester Caudill
Round Politics
Comment by Jeff Musall
Secular Humanity
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Randy Inman
Waxing Political
Football Dogz
NCstuff
The Right Side
I don't think we could have a one world government with the current number of people on the planet. Unless it was under Islam the Muslims would fight it forever.
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
First of all, a lot of the difficult parts are already handled...European Union, World Bank, global economic depression, failure of national currencies, dismantling of the constitution (In U.S.), etc etc etc.
The NWO is already here in some ways. And that isn't paranoid ranting, that's just a fact. And if we do go all of the way toward a One World Gov't, I predict it will look nothing like the Sci Fi notions we've concocted. It will be something we are slowly and deliberately eased into, and I imagine it may be sooner than later.
I'll now remove my tinfoil hat.
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
First of all, a lot of the difficult parts are already handled...European Union, World Bank, global economic depression, failure of national currencies, dismantling of the constitution (In U.S.), etc etc etc.
The NWO is already here in some ways. And that isn't paranoid ranting, that's just a fact. And if we do go all of the way toward a One World Gov't, I predict it will look nothing like the Sci Fi notions we've concocted. It will be something we are slowly and deliberately eased into, and I imagine it may be sooner than later.
I'll now remove my tinfoil hat.
Comment by GlenB
Raw Fish
Comment by Lawrie
Political World
Political Views
Have I Arrived?
Historical Profiles
Thoughts On Sports
Lawrie
Thoughts 'n' Things
Look at the experiment going on in Europe with the European Union. The so-called democracy, as seen through the eyes of the European politicos is one of "We decide - You concur". In my country, the UK, the majority of the population are against entry and the promised referendum to enable a .vote has never taken place. Meanwhile, due to political machinations, we are governed to an extent by European laws which take priority over our own laws. This has resulted in quite a lot of angry people. The people of Ireland held a referendum and voted "No" to Europe. The European parliament then ordered the Irish government to hold another referendum.
There you have only a very small sample from a very small corner of the world. Hence the reason I cannot see a future world with only one government.
Comment by Randy Inman
Waxing Political
Football Dogz
NCstuff
The Right Side
Comment by TastefulWriter
A One World Government means that the rich will be able to push around poor people more than they already do.
In a One World Government, the banks will be in control.
Don't let a One World Government happen.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
As for the banks being in control, remember who owns the banks now. Crooked politicians.
Comment by TastefulWriter
Mergers and acquisitions by the wealthy few have narrowed competition.
Standing up to the wealthy will result in opening up competition.
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
This class envy is just a device that comes from the White House to keep people unhappy and voting Democrat.
Comment by TastefulWriter
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
In fact, I would agree with both sides, in that I feel the line between politician and mega-corporations are pretty blurred anyway. Hand in hand, yes?
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Randy Inman
Waxing Political
Football Dogz
NCstuff
The Right Side
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Anonymous
Now of course Kissinger is a member of the organisations pushing this agenda #i.e Council Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilbergers#
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Troy Geri
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
My main concern is that the MSM is so busy slobbering all over B.O. (B.S.) and calling him a "god." No matter what he does, they keep drooling on him and singing his praises to high Heaven. I have a suspicion that Heaven isn't all that pleased.
Comment by Randy Inman
Waxing Political
Football Dogz
NCstuff
The Right Side
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Jeff Musall
Secular Humanity
Comment by S.L.
The Political Brief
Comment by Randy Inman
Waxing Political
Football Dogz
NCstuff
The Right Side